Indiana Supreme Pearl Jam Court Denies Gun Manufacturers'

Indiana Supreme discloses pearl jam download Court Denies pearljam even evaluates Gun Manufacturers' Appeal of Gary, Indiana'sLawsuitFIRST STATE SUPREME COURT TO REJECT APPLICATION OF FEDERAL GUN INDUSTRY SHIELDLAWWASHINGTON, Jan. 12 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- In a landmark ruling today, theIndiana Supreme Court ruled that the City of Gary's lawsuit against gunmanufacturers may proceed to trial.The Court refused to hear a challenge tothe Indiana Court of Appeals' October 2007 ruling rejecting gun industryclaims that the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act shields thegun industry from liability for irresponsible sales practices that funnel gunsto the criminal market.In a major setback to the gun industry, the Indiana Supreme Court refused thegun manufacturers' petition to transfer the case, instead allowing the Courtof Appeals ruling to stand.The Court of Appeals held on October 29, 2007,that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act does not shield gunmanufacturers from liability for sales practices that knowingly violateIndiana's public nuisance statute.The ruling by the Supreme Court todayallows Gary, Indiana's lawsuit against sixteen gun manufacturers and sixnorthern Indiana gun dealers to proceed to trial.Lawyers from the BradyCenter's Legal Action Project represent the City of Gary in the case."The Indiana Supreme Court's ruling is an important victory for the people ofGary and particularly those who have suffered from the gun industry's supplyof guns to criminals and gun traffickers," said Paul Helmke, President of theBrady Center and former Mayor of Fort Wayne, Indiana."When the gun industryviolates the law and allows dangerous people easy access to illegal firearms,it should be held accountable."Brian J. Siebel, Senior Attorney with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violenceand co-counsel representing the City of Gary, stated: "After years of delaycaused by numerous rejected gun industry appeals, the citizens of Gary mayfinally have their day in court and help put an end to the unlawful practicesof gun makers that funnel guns into the criminal market."This is the second ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court in this case.Itunanimously ruled in Gary v Smith & Wesson Corp. in December 2003 that theCity stated valid claims alleging "that the Manufacturers knowinglyparticipated in a distribution system that unnecessarily and sometimes evenintentionally provided guns to criminals, juveniles, and others who may notlawfully purchase them."Gary's case began with a sting conducted by Gary police of northern Indianagun dealers that, between them, supplied more than 60 percent of the crimeguns recovered in the city.The dealers' sales to undercover officers posingas "straw purchasers" was captured on videotape before the suit was filed, andconfirmed the dealers' gross misconduct in supplying the underground market.

Gary also sued the major gun manufacturers who sold handguns through thesedealerships and profited from the diversion of guns to criminals.Tony Walker and Lukas Cohen, of the Walker Law Group in Indiana, and Robert S.Peck of the Center for Constitutional Litigation, serve as co-counsel with theBrady Center in the case.As the nation's largest national, non-partisan, grassroots organizationsleading the fight to prevent gun violence, the Brady Center to Prevent GunViolence is dedicated to creating an America free from gun violence, where allAmericans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in their communities.CONTACT: Peter SOURCEBrady Campaign to Prevent Gun ViolencePeter Hamm of the Brady Campaign, +1-202-289-5792, pearl jam online . LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A California appeals court on Monday cleared the way for the owner of a hybrid Honda Civic to sue the car's maker for false advertising in a lawsuit that claims Honda has had so many complaints about the hybrid it has told U.S regulators it wants to revise the mileage rating pearljam better . U.S.The state appeals court in San Diego remanded the false advertising claims back to the trial court, acknowledging that while Federal law does protect carmarkers from some lawsuits over disclosure of fuel economy standards, it does not preempt them from being sued over everything they say about fuel efficiency.The lawsuit is not the first to challenge the Civic Hybrid's mileage claims.A Honda representative said the company does not comment on ongoing litigation.The original lawsuit was brought in 2005 by Gaetano Paduano against American Honda Motor Co Inc over claims that his 2004 Honda Civic Hybrid achieved less than half the advertised city mileage of 47 miles per gallon (MPG) and highway MPG of 48.A brochure advertising the car stated that it could be driven like a conventional car and still achieve the advertised mileage, a statement Paduano said was contradicted by Honda dealership and customer services personnel, the opinion said.A Honda customer service representative told Paduano that the company had received "a high number of complaints about customers not receiving the posted and advertised mileage," the opinion said.The representative also told Paduano that both Honda and Toyota have approached the EPA to change the mileage rating to be more in line with the mileage drivers were achieving in their hybrid vehicles, the opinion said of pearljam . Toyota was not immediately available for comment.Paduano "presented evidence that directly disputes Honda's claim that a driver need not do anything special in order to achieve gas mileage close to the EPA estimate," the Fourth District Court of Appeal wrote in its 2-1 opinion.Paduano's lawsuit skirts the federal preemption rule because it centers on Honda's claim that the car can be driven like a conventional vehicle and still get the advertised mileage, the court said.A trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Honda on all claims in 2006.(Reporting by Gina Keating; editing by Carol Bishopric) U.S. me pearljam . Mueller Water Products Announces First Quarter 2009 Earnings Release Date andConference CallATLANTA, Jan.

12 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Mueller Water Products, Inc.(NYSE: MWA.B, MWA) will release financial results for its first quarter endedDecember 31, 2008 on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 after market close, the Companyannounced today.Gregory E pearl jam photos . Hyland, chairman, president and chief executive officer ofMueller Water Products, and other members of the Company's leadership teamwill hold a conference call to discuss the financial results on Wednesday,February 4, 2009 at 9:00 a.m (EST) man pearljam . A live webcast of the conference callwill be accessible on the Mueller Water Products Web site,, and also will be archived for approximately 90days.Safe Harbor StatementExcept for historical information contained herein, the statements in thispresentation are forward-looking and made pursuant to the safe harborprovisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for pearljam . Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that maycause the actual results of Mueller Water Products, Inc and pearljam .

in future periods todiffer materially from forecasted results . Those risks include, among others,changes in customer orders and demand for our products; changes in rawmaterial prices, labor, equipment and transportation costs; pricing actions bythe Company and its competitors; changes in law; the ability to attract andretain management and employees; the inability to successfully executemanagement strategies with respect to cost containment, production increasesor decreases, inventory control, the integration of acquired businesses, andthe commencement of operations at our new manufacturing plant; and generalchanges in economic and financial conditions, residential construction ormunicipal spending free pearljam . Risks associated with forward-looking statements are morefully described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Mueller Water Products assumes no duty to update its forward-lookingstatements as of any future date.About Mueller Water ProductsMueller Water Products is a leading North American manufacturer andmarketer of infrastructure and flow control products for use in waterdistribution networks and treatment facilities pearljam rearview . Its broad product portfolioincludes engineered valves, hydrants, ductile iron pipe and pipe fittings,which are utilized by municipalities, as well as the commercial andresidential construction, oil and gas, HVAC and fire protection industries.With annual net sales of approximately $1.9 billion, the Company is comprisedof three main operating segments: Mueller Co., U.S Pipe and Anvil . Based inAtlanta, Georgia, the Company employs approximately 6,500 people. MuellerWater Products Series B common stock and Series A common stock trade on theNew York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbols MWA.B and MWA, respectively.For more information about Mueller Water Products, please visit the Company'sWeb site at Contact: Martie Edmunds ZakasSr. Vice President - Strategic Planning & Investor Media Contact: John PensecDirector - Corporate Communications and Public SOURCEMueller Water Products, Inc.Investors, Martie Edmunds Zakas, Sr.