When a hostile question-mark is detected anywhere over the no-fly zones he dives for the
Posted by Admin· Print This Article
When a hostile question-mark is detected anywhere over the no-fly zones he dives for the clouds, either citing the continued intransigence of Saddam Hussein (quite a good argument) or flag-waving for our boys in the air (a rather less reputable one). I doubt if he will have been greatly enlightened by the response, since Mr Robertson's terms of engagement are simple. I have meditated on this phrase for some time without being able to penetrate its transcendental enigmas. It is a grammatical Mobius strip and I offer it to readers as a kind of Zen koan - like the sound of one-hand clapping.Tam Dalyell finally succeeded in dragging George Robertson to the dispatch box to answer a Private Notice Question about the current terms of engagement in Iraq, a fitting reward for his determination over this matter. Yesterday the trophy for linguistic opacity went to David Amess, one of those people whose personal volume control seems to have been knocked out of whack by a blow to the head.He boomed out a convoluted question that ended with a request to know how the Chancellor proposed to keep his economic promises "without supposedly not raising taxes". Ms Hewitt's remarks bore a much closer relation to what emerges after the hogwash has been through a pig.Things aren't much better on the other side.
"Hogwash!" barked Nicholas Winterton furiously after one particularly egregious example, but that was a libel on hogwash, which at least has some nutritional content. "We'll take no lessons from politicians on the matter of plain- speaking," the Revenue might legitimately reply.Sometimes utterance is simply detached from any meaningful content, as when Patricia Hewitt drifted off into one of those fog-machine denunciations of the Conservative Party record, garlanded with dog-eared election slogans ("the people of this country blah blah .. safe in Labour hands .. blah blah"). This is a laudable aim but one wonders whether Parliament is quite the body to drive it through, having a distinctly ambiguous relationship to our native tongue itself. After all, he hasn't answered a Conservative question for the past six months. Why should he begin now? Paul Truswell, Labour member for Pudsey, later asked Barbara Roche whether the Inland Revenue might be encouraged to use plain English in the explanatory leaflets it sends out to taxpayers it has overcharged. Then he stood up to speak and I realised that my anxiety had been hopelessly naive.
There was no chance Mr Brown would be seduced into indiscretion by Opposition MPs. Would the fiscal Nubians who guard him really let him loose at the moment when his virtue was most vulnerable to improper advances? There he was, though, barefaced in the market place, and subject to the impertinent remarks of every passing Tom, Dick or Angus. Surely he should be reclining in some Civil Service zenana, murmuring sweet nothings at his economic advisers from behind a fetching tartan yashmak. WITH ALL this talk of purdah in recent days I had imagined that the Chancellor might absent himself from Treasury questions. At its new premises, the Reichstag in Berlin, Parliament is likely to become even more popular.China: China's parliament, the National People's Congress, meets just once a year, in March, and only diplomats, journalists and other accredited observers can gain access to the Great Hall of the People to witness proceedings..

